Reading Practice

The Pursuit of Natural Knowledge from Manuscript to Print

Network Analysis

Before the incorporation of the Stationers’ Company in 1557, English printers very often published editions of the same practical texts and competed with one another in the very crowded London print market. As I show in Reading Practice, these practical books were often sourced from fifteenth-century manuscripts sources, which contained medical recipes, herbals, texts on phlebotomy, on uroscopy, on agriculture, and on animal husbandry that were subsequently printed in vernacular editions. By and large, for the first six decades of English print, London publishers very rarely commissioned new practical texts for publication. They simply reproduced editions of texts that were already enormously popular in manuscript. Before the creation of the Stationers’ Register, there was little to stop an English printer from reproducing his own copy of a rival’s medical recipe collection. As a result, the English print market was cluttered with competing editions of the same practical texts. Yet every printer needed readers to purchase their edition over that of their rival if they wanted to stay in business.

When I realized that so many early editions of practical books were reprints of older texts from manuscript sources, which were then reissued in multiple editions, it became clear to me that I could only understand the densely interconnected market for practical books if I plotted these editions and their publishers in a network. To do so, I used the publication data I had compiled from the English Short Title Catalogue, viewable and downloadable as Print Appendix A, which I then cleaned and standardized using OpenRefine. Because early modern printers so often retitled subsequent editions of the same texts, and because spelling conventions were so inconsistent in the sixteenth century, I used the assigned STC number for every edition to establish standard titles for all editions of the same text. Only then would it be possible to see how many editions of the same practical texts were published over the period from 1485 to 1550.

The dataset with these standardized titles is available for download as a .csv file here.

Printers and Editions of Practical Books, 1485–1550


This network analysis was produced using Cytoscape (version 3.8.2), an open source software platform for visualizing complex networks. For more information about Cytoscape please visit Cytoscape.org.

Interpreting the Network Analysis

In the network visualization above, we see 149 editions of practical books, which represent just 49 unique texts. Each of those 49 unique texts appears as one node within the network diagram (in blue), just as every English printer is represented by a single node (in black). In addition, both printers’ names and the titles of books have been sized relative to their frequency in the network. So, for example, in the interactive visualization below, you can see that Richard Banckes’s very popular herbal (represented in this figure as A boke of the properties of herbes the which is called an herbal) and the medical recipe collection Treasure of pore men were central to the economy of practical knowledge exchange in sixteenth-century England, given that their titles appear larger than others in the network. But, Richard Banckes’s name is small in this network, because he only produced just four editions of practical books.

In addition to the relative sizes of nodes within the diagram, lines connecting printers and book titles represent a single edition of that book. For example, at the bottom left of the network diagram, the two lines connecting Reynolde Wolde to The urinal of phyisick indicate that Wolfe printed two editions of the text over the course of his career. Really popular titles like This is the myrour or glasse of helth have multiple lines connecting the title to multiple printers, indicating that the work went through several editions from multiple printing houses. The title This is the myrour or glasse of helth is larger than that of This lytell boke contaynethe certayne gostly medycynes because it was issued more than a dozen times before 1550, whereas This lytell boke was issued only once.

You can explore the network analysis by clicking on individual nodes or edges, or even rearranging the nodes in the network to get a better sense of how London printers competed over the same practical texts. Use two fingers to zoom in and out (you’ll zoom in wherever the mouse cursor is located in the network) and click and drag individual dones to move them in the network.


Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C
Bibliographic Data Network Analysis Graphs & Gantt Plots